Newsletters

For 2024, the Social Security wage cap will be $168,600, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 3.2 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

The IRS announced tax relief for individuals and businesses affected by terrorist attacks in the State of Israel. The IRS would continue to monitor events and may provide additional relief.

The IRS announced tax relief for individuals and businesses affected by terrorist attacks in the State of Israel. The IRS would continue to monitor events and may provide additional relief.

Filing and Payment Deadlines Extended

The IRS extended certain deadlines that occurred or would occur during the period from October 7, 2023, through October 7, 2024. As a result, affected individuals and businesses would have until October 7, 2024, to file returns and pay any taxes that were originally due during this period. This extension includes filing for most returns, including:

• individuals who had a valid extension to file their 2022 return due to run out on October 16, 2023. However, because tax payments related to these 2022 returns were due on April 18, 2023, those payments were not eligible for this relief. So, these individuals filing on extension have more time to file, but not to pay;
• calendar-year corporations whose 2022 extensions run out on October 16, 2023. Similarly, these corporations have more time to file, but not to pay;
• 2023 individual and business returns and payments normally due on March 15 and April 15, 2024. These individuals and businesses have both more time to file and more time to pay;
• quarterly estimated income tax payments normally due on January 16, April 15, June 17 and September 16, 2024;
• quarterly payroll and excise tax returns normally due on October 31, 2023, and January 31, April 30 and July 31, 2024;
• calendar-year tax-exempt organizations whose extensions run out on November 15, 2023; and
• retirement plan contributions and rollovers.

The penalty for failure to make payroll and excise tax deposits due on or after October 7, 2023 and before November 6, 2023, would be abated. But the deposits must be made by November 6, 2023.

Notice 2023-71

IR-2023-188

The Internal Revenue Service could release as soon as today the process that businesses can use to withdraw employee retention credit claims.

The Internal Revenue Service could release as soon as today the process that businesses can use to withdraw employee retention credit claims.

The move comes in the wake of the agency announcing that it is halting the processing of new ERC claims until at least the beginning of 2024 and scrutinizing existing claims due to the prevalence of suspected fraudulent claims following a spike in claims in 2023 coupled with the saturation marketing by so-called ERC mills. Thus far, the IRS closer examination of claims has led to thousands already being submitted for auditing.

As part of the heightened scrutiny of claims, the IRS said it would create a process by which businesses would have the ability to withdraw claims before they are processed if they do a more thorough review and determine the claim is not actually a valid claim for the credit that was created as part of the CARES Act to help businesses that may have lost income retain employees during the COVID-19 pandemic.

"I learned this morning that there is going to be an announcement tomorrow [October 19, 2023] on the withdrawal process initiative that the Service is going to be initiating," Linda Azmon, special counsel at the IRS’s Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, said October 18, 2023, during a session of the American Bar Association’s Virtual 2023 Fall Tax Meeting.

Azmon said that "taxpayers who have not received their claims for refund will be entitled to participate in this process," adding that there is "going to be specific procedures that taxpayers can follow to request their withdrawal of their claims for refund."

She did not provide any specific information on what the process entails, but noted that requesting a withdrawal "means that a taxpayer is requesting that the amended return not be processed at all. And it’s going to be required that the complete return be withdrawn." This is limited to taxpayers who have not had their claim processed, have not received their check or who have the check but have not yet cashed it.

One of the reasons a taxpayer may want to withdraw a claim is "taxpayers have been advised that the only way the Service can recapture claims for refund is through the erroneous refund procedures," she said. "That usually means the service asks for the funds back and if they don’t receive it, the Service asks [the] Department of Justice to bring suit within two years of the payment."

But Azmon points out that taxpayers being told this are being given information that is not entirely correct, as the agency has issued final regulations that allow the IRS to treat an erroneous refund as an underpayment of tax subject to the regular assessment and administrative collections procedures.

"This is a way for the service to recover funds that a taxpayer should have received in an efficient way without the cost of litigation," she said. "And it still provides the administrative processing rights for taxpayers to dispute their claims" without the cost of litigation.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The Internal Revenue Service detailed how it is proceeding with a pilot program that will allow taxpayers to file their taxes directly on the IRS website as an option along with doing an electronic file or working through a tax professional or other third-party tax preparer.

The IRS released substantial new guidance regarding the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit. The guidance updates procedures for manufacturer, dealer and seller registrations and written reports; and provides detailed rules for a taxpayer’s election to transfer a credit to the dealer after 2023. The guidance includes:

The IRS released substantial new guidance regarding the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit. The guidance updates procedures for manufacturer, dealer and seller registrations and written reports; and provides detailed rules for a taxpayer’s election to transfer a credit to the dealer after 2023. The guidance includes:

• -- Rev. Proc. 2023-33, which is scheduled to be published on October 23, 2023, in I.R.B. 2023-43;
• -- NPRM REG-113064-23, which is scheduled to published in the Federal Register on October 10, 2023; and
• -- IRS Fact Sheet FS-2023-22, which updates the IRS Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the clean vehicle credits.

The proposed regs are generally proposed to apply to tax years beginning after they are published in the Federal Register. However, the proposed regs for transferring credits to dealers are proposed to apply beginning on January 1, 2024, which is when the transfer election becomes available. Proposed regs for treating the omission of a correct vehicle identification number (VIN) as a mathematical or clerical error would also apply to the Code Sec. 45W clean commercial vehicle credit. They are proposed to apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2023.

Comments are requested. Rev. Proc. 2022-42 is superseded in part.

Proposed Regs for the Clean Vehicle Credits

For purposes of the new clean vehicle credit, the used clean vehicle credit, and the commercial clean vehicle credit, the proposed regs would treat a taxpayer as having omitted the required correct vehicle identification number (VIN) for the vehicle if the VIN is missing from the taxpayer’s return or the number reported on the return is an invalid VIN. An invalid VIN is a number that does not match any existing VIN reported by a qualified manufacturer. A taxpayer would also be treated as omitting the VIN if the provided VIN is not for a qualified vehicle for the year the credit is claimed.

With respect to the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit, the proposed regs would clarify that taxpayer must file an income tax return for the year the clean vehicle is placed in service, including a Form 8936, Clean Vehicle Credits. The taxpayer is treated as having omitted the vehicle’s correct VIN if the VIN on the taxpayer’s return does not match the VIN in the seller’s report. In addition, a dealer under the proposed regs would not include persons licensed solely by a U.S. territory. To facilitate direct-to-consumer sales, a dealer generally could make sales outside the jurisdiction where it is licensed; however, it could not make sales at sites outside its own jurisdiction.

New Rules for Used Clean Vehicle Credit

The proposed regs would clarify that a vehicle’s eligibility for the used vehicle credit is not affected by a title that indicates it has been damaged or an otherwise a branded title. In addition, the used vehicle credit could not be divided among multiple owners of a single vehicle. With respect to the MAGI limit for eligible taxpayers, if the taxpayer's filing status for the tax year differs from the taxpayer's filing status in the preceding tax year, the taxpayer would satisfy the limit if MAGI does not exceed the threshold amount in either year based on the applicable filing status for that tax year. These last two rules are consistent with earlier proposed regs for the new clean vehicle credit.

The proposed regs would provide a first transfer rule, under which a qualified sale must be the first transfer of the previously-owned clean vehicle since August 16, 2022, as shown by the vehicle history of such vehicle, after the sale to the original owner. The rule would ignore transfers between dealers. The taxpayer generally could rely on the dealer’s representation of the vehicle history; however, taxpayers would also be encouraged to independently examine the vehicle history to confirm whether the first transfer rule is satisfied.

Under the proposed regs, a used vehicle’s sale price would include delivery charges, as well as fees and charges imposed by the dealer. The sale price it would not include separately-stated taxes and fees required by law, separate financing, extended warranties, insurance or maintenance service charges.

Cancellation of Sale, Return of Clean Vehicle, and Resale of Clean Vehicle

The proposed regs would clarify that a taxpayer cannot claim a clean vehicle credit if the sale is canceled before the taxpayer places th vehicle in service (that is, before the taxpayer takes delivery). The credits also would not be available if the taxpayer returns the vehicle within 30 days after placing it in service. A returned new clean vehicle would no longer qualify as a new clean vehicle. However, a returned used clean vehicle could continue to qualify for the credit if the vehicle history does not reflect the sale and return. A vehicle’s return would nullify any election the taxpayer made to transfer the credit for the vehicle.

Under the proposed regs, a taxpayer acquires a clean vehicle for resale if the resale occurs withing 30 days after the taxpayer places the vehicle in service. The resold vehicle would not qualify for either credit. If the taxpayer elected to transfer the credit, the election remains valid after the resale; thus, the credit is recaptured from the taxpayer, not from the dealer.

Taxpayers returning or reselling a clean vehicle more than 30 days after the date the taxpayer placed it in service would generally remain eligible for the applicable clean vehicle credit for purchasing the vehicle. Any election to transfer the taxpayer’s credit to the dealer also remains in effect. The returned or resold vehicle would not remain eligible for either credit. However, the IRS could disallow the credit if, based on the facts and circumstances, it determines that the taxpayer purchased the vehicle with the intent to resell or return it

Taxpayer's Election to Transfer Clean Vehicle Credit to Dealer

A taxpayer that elects to transfer a credit to a registered dealer must transfer the entire amount of the allowable credit. Each taxpayer may transfer a total of two credits per year (either two new clean vehicle credits, or one new clean vehicle credit and one used clean vehicle credit). This is the case even if married taxpayers file a joint return. A transfer election is irrevocable.

Under the proposed regs, the amount of a clean vehicle credit an electing taxpayer could transfer could exceed the electing taxpayer’s regular tax liability; and the amount of a transferred credit would not be subject to recapture merely because it exceeds the taxpayer’s tax liability. The dealer’s payment for the transferred credit, whether in cash or as a partial payment or down payment for the vehicle, is not includible in the electing taxpayer’s gross income. To ensure that the credit properly reduces the taxpayer’s basis in the vehicle, the electing taxpayer is treated as repaying the payment to the dealer as part of the purchase price of the vehicle.

Both the electing taxpayer and the dealer must make detailed disclosures and attestations. Some of these disclosures must be made to the other party, and some must be made through the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. All must be made no later than the time of the sale. A taxpayer cannot transfer any portion of the new clean vehicle credit that is treated as part of the general business credit.

A seller or a registered dealer must retain records of transferred credits for at least three years after the taxpayer makes the credit transfer election or a seller files its report for the sale.

Manufacturer, Dealer and Seller Registration and Report Requirements

Clean vehicle manufacturers, sellers and dealers must register through an IRS Energy Credits Online Portal that should be available on the IRS website later this month. A representative of the manufacturer, seller or dealer will have to create or sign into an account on irs.gov. Registration help is available at www.irs.gov/registerhelp. Manufacturers, sellers and dealers may check IRS.gov/cleanvehicles for updates.

Taxpayers and sellers may rely on information and certifications by a qualified manufacturer providing that a vehicle is eligible for the new clean vehicle credit or the used clean vehicle credit. However, this reliance is limited to information regarding the vehicle’s eligibility for the applicable credit.

Rev. Proc. 2023-33 details the required registration information for sellers and dealers. The IRS will confirm the information or notify the seller or dealer that it has been unable to do so. If the IRS accepts a dealer registration, it will issue a unique dealer identification number. If the IRS rejects the registration, the dealer may request administrative review.

s for a qualified manufacturer’s written agreement with and a dealer’s written reports to the IRS before January 1, 2024, manufacturers and sellers may still use the procedures described in Rev. Proc. 2022-42. However, as of January 1, 2024, qualified manufacturers must have entered into written agreements with the IRS via the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal, even if they previously registered and filed written agreements under Rev. Proc. 2022-42. Also as of January 1, 2024, qualified manufacturers and sellers must use the Portal to file their required reports to the IRS.

A seller must file its report within three calendar days of the sale, and provide a copy to the taxpayer within another three days. If the information in the report does not match information in IRS records, the IRS may reject the report and notify the seller. The seller must notify the buyer within three calendar days. If the IRS rejects a seller report, a dealer will not be eligible for advance credit payments. A seller must also use the Portal to update or rescind information for a scrivener’s error or the cancellation of a sale as promptly as possible (the seller must also file a new report noting the return of a vehicle). The seller must notify the buyer within three calendar days and provide a copy of the updated or rescinded report.

Advance Credit Payments to Dealers

When a buyer elects to transfer a clean vehicle credit to a dealer, the advance credit program allows the dealer to receive payment of the credit before the dealer files its tax return. The proposed regs would clarify that the advance payments are not included in the dealer’s income and they may exceed the dealer’s tax liability. The dealer cannot deduct the payment made to the electing taxpayer. The advance payment is included in the amount realized by the dealer on the sale of the clean vehicle. If the dealer is a partnership or an S corporation, the advance payment is not treated as exempt income.

To receive advance credit payments, the registered dealer must be an eligible entity under the proposed regs. An eligible entity is a registered dealer that submits additional registration information and is in dealer tax compliance. The IRS will conduct dealer tax compliance checks before disbursing an advance credit payment, and also on a continuing and regular basis.

Dealer tax compliance means that, for all tax periods during the most recent five tax years, the dealer has filed all of its required federal information and tax returns, including for federal income and employment tax; and paid all federal tax, penalties, and interest due at the time of sale (or is current on its obligations under any installment agreement with the IRS). The dealer must also retain information related to the vehicle sale or credit transfer for at least three years. A dealer that does not satisfy this test may still be a registered dealer, but it cannot be an eligible entity until the tax compliance issue is resolved.

The dealer that receives the transferred credit must provide the qualified vehicle’s VIN, the seller report, and the required taxpayer disclosure information through the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. The IRS will disburse advance payments of the credits only through electronic payments; it will not issue any paper checks.

The IRS may suspend a registered dealer’s eligibility to participate in the advance payment program for sever reasons, including the provision of inaccurate information regarding eligible for the credit; failure to satisfy dealer tax compliance requirements; and failure to properly use the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. The IRS will notify the dealer of its suspension, and give the dealer an opportunity correct the errors. If a suspended dealer does not correct the errors withing one year, the IRS will revoke its registration.

The IRS may also revoke a dealer’s registration to receive transferred credits and its eligibility for the advance payment program for failure to comply with the registration or tax compliance requirements, for losing its dealer license, for providing inaccurate information, for failing to retain required records for three years, or if it is suspended three times in the preceding year. The IRS will notify the dealer within 30 days of its decision to revoke eligibility for the advance payment program, and the dealer may request administrative review of the decision. The dealer may re-register after one year, but will be permanently barred after three revocations.

The proposed regs would provide that a dealer could not administratively appeal the IRS’s decisions relating to the suspension or revocation of a dealer’s registration unless the IRS and the IRS Independent Office of Appeals agree that such review is available and the IRS provides the time and manner for the review.

Comments Requested

The IRS requests comments on the proposed regs. Comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by December 11, 2023. They may be mailed to the IRS, or submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-113064-23).

Effect on Other Documents

Rev. Proc. 2023-33 supersedes in part Rev. Proc. 2022-42, I.R.B. 2022-52 , 565.

Proposed Regulations, NPRM REG-113064-23

Rev. Proc. 2023-33

FS-2023-22

IR-2023-186

The IRS has released the 2023-2024 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:

The IRS has released the 2023-2024 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:

• 1. the special transportation industry meal and incidental expenses (M&IE) rates,
• 2. the rate for the incidental expenses only deduction,
• 3. and the rates and list of high-cost localities for purposes of the high-low substantiation method.

Transportation Industry Special Per Diem Rates

The special M&IE rates for taxpayers in the transportation industry are:

• $69 for any locality of travel in the continental United States (CONUS), and
• $74 for any locality of travel outside the continental United States (OCONUS).

Incidental Expenses Only Rate

The rate is $5 per day for any CONUS or OCONUS travel for the incidental expenses only deduction.

High-Low Substantiation Method

For purposes of the high-low substantiation method, the 2023-2024 special per diem rates are:

• $309 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
• $214 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

The amount treated as paid for meals is:

• $74 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
• $64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS

Instead of the meal and incidental expenses only substantiation method, taxpayers may use:

• $74 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
• $64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

Taxpayers using the high-low method must comply with Rev. Proc. 2019-48, I.R.B. 2019-51, 1390. That procedure provides the rules for using a per diem rate to substantiate the amount of ordinary and necessary business expenses paid or incurred while traveling away from home.

The IRS provided guidance on the new energy efficient home credit, as amended by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169). The guidance largely reiterates the statutory requirements for the credit, but it provides some new details regarding definitions, certifications and substantiation.

The IRS provided guidance on the new energy efficient home credit, as amended by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169). The guidance largely reiterates the statutory requirements for the credit, but it provides some new details regarding definitions, certifications and substantiation.

Definitions

For purposes of the requirement that a home must be acquired from an eligible contractor, a home leased from the contractor for use as a residence is considered acquired from the contractor. However, a home the contractor retains for use as a residence is not acquired from the contractor. A manufactured home may be acquired directly from the contractor, or indirectly from an intermediary that acquired it from the contractor and then sold or leased it to a buyer for use as a residence, or to intervening intermediaries that eventually sold it to a buyer for use as a residence.

For a constructed home, the eligible contractor is the person that built and owned the home and had a basis in it during its construction. For a manufactured home, the eligible contractor is the person that produced the home and owned and had a basis in it during its production.

The United States includes only the states and the District of Columbia.

Certifications

A dwelling unit that is certified under the applicable Energy Star program is considered to meet the program requirements for purposes of the credit. Similarly, a dwelling unit that is certified under the Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) program is deemed to meet the requirements for the credit for a ZERH. The ZERH program in effect for purposes of the credit is the one in effect as of the date identified on the Department of Energy’s ZERH webpage at https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/doe-zero-energy-ready-home-zerh-program-requirements.

The eligible contractor must obtain the appropriate Energy Star or ZERH certification before claiming the credit. The contractor should keep the certification with its tax records, but does not have to file it with the return that claims the credit.

Rules for homes acquired before 2023, under which eligible certifiers could certify a home and contractors could use approved software to calculate a new home’s energy consumption, do not apply to a home acquired after 2022.

Substantiation

To substantiate the credit, the contractor must retain in its tax records, at a minimum, the home's Energy Star or ZERH certification, including its date; and records sufficient to establish:

1. the address of the qualified home and its location in the United States;
2. the taxpayer’s status as an eligible contractor;
3. the acquisition of the home from the taxpayer for use as a residence, including the name of the person who acquired it; and
4. if applicable, proof that the prevailing wage requirements were met.

However, for a manufactured home the contractor sells to a dealer, a safe harbor allows the contractor to rely on a statement by the dealer to establish the date the home was acquired, its location in the United States, and its acquisition for use as a residence. The statement must:

1. Specify the date of the retail sale of the manufactured home, state that the dealer delivered it to the purchaser at an address in the United States, and provide that the dealer has no knowledge of any information suggesting that the purchaser will use the manufactured home other than as a residence;
2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the dealer and any intervening intermediaries; and
3. Declare, under penalties of perjury, that the dealer statement and any accompanying documents are true, correct and complete.

Effect on Other Documents

Notice 2008-35, 2008-1 CB 647, and Notice 2008-36, 2008-1 CB 650, are obsoleted for qualified homes acquired after December 31, 2022.

The IRS identified drought-stricken areas where tax relief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-stricken area has a drought-free year.

The IRS identified drought-stricken areas where tax relief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-stricken area has a drought-free year.

When Sales of Livestock are Involuntary Conversions

Sales of livestock due to drought are involuntary conversions of property. Taxpayers can postpone gain on involuntary conversions if they buy qualified replacement property during the replacement period. Qualified replacement property must be similar or related in service or use to the converted property.

Usually, the replacement period ends two years after the tax year in which the involuntary conversion occurs. However, a longer replacement period applies in several situations, such as when sales occur in a drought-stricken area.

Livestock Sold Because of Weather

Taxpayers have four years to replace livestock they sold or exchanged solely because of drought, flood, or other weather condition. Three conditions apply.

First, the livestock cannot be raised for slaughter, held for sporting purposes or be poultry.

Second, the taxpayer must have held the converted livestock for:

• draft,
• dairy, or
• breeeding purposes.

Third, the weather condition must make the area eligible for federal assistance.

Persistent Drought

The IRS extends the four-year replacement period when a taxpayer sells or exchanges livestock due to persistent drought. The extension continues until the taxpayer’s region experiences a drought-free year.

The first drought-free year is the first 12-month period that:

• ends on August 31 in or after the last year of the four-year replacement period, and
• does not include any weekly period of drought.

What Areas are Suffering from Drought

The National Drought Mitigation Center produces weekly Drought Monitor maps that report drought-stricken areas. Taxpayers can view these maps at

http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/Maps/MapArchive.aspx

However, the IRS also provided a list of areas where the year ending on August 31, 2023, was not a drought-free year. The replacement period in these areas will continue until the area has a drought-free year.

With the Internal Revenue Service announcing more details on how it will be targeting America’s wealthiest taxpayers, Kostelanetz’s Megan Brackney offered up some advice on preparing for increased compliance activity.

With the Internal Revenue Service announcing more details on how it will be targeting America’s wealthiest taxpayers, Kostelanetz’s Megan Brackney offered up some advice on preparing for increased compliance activity.

The first step, especially for those that fall within the agency’s announced parameters for who is being targeted, is to review recent tax filings. The agency announced in September it would be targeting large partnerships.

"I would say to look back over the last three years because that’s the typical statute of limitations period for the IRS to audit and assess, maybe look back even a little bit longer," Brackney, partner at the law firm, said in an interview.

In particular, she recommended a focus on major financial transactions.

"Look at significant transactions and make sure that you have all the substantiation because a lot of times, the issue isn’t so much a legal question or anything to complex," she continued. "It’s just whether or not you know [for example if] the partnership sold an asset, do they actually have records that substantiate their basis?"

Brackney expects that after the agency completes its work on the largest partnerships, it will continue this kind of compliance work on those high earning partnerships that may be outside of the original targeted thresholds.

Other things to start thinking about if you are a large partnership is how you plan to respond to an audit if you end up targeted for enforcement action by the IRS, especially if you have significant transactions that might draw extra scrutiny. Some questions to ponder are whether you have the in-house expertise to handle an audit or if you plan on going to an outside source.

"Nobody is going to do those things until they are actually audited, but its good to start thinking about it and planning it," she said. "And if you do have a really significant transaction, maybe go ahead and have someone take a look at it already to make sure it is properly documented."

She also suggested that if a partnership finds an error as they look back on their own to go ahead and correct it with the IRS before the agency "is poking around and looking at it."

Training Concerns

And while the IRS is moving forward with its plans to audit high earning partnerships, Brackney expressed some concerns relative to agent training.

She recalled a few years ago when the IRS announced global high net worth audits program that ended up collecting very little.

"Most of those audits resulted in no change letters," Brackney said, "which is wild because you audit a normal middle-class taxpayer with a Schedule C business, you are going to have a change [and] not because anybody is trying to cheat. There is going to be something that they can’t substantiate."

She said it was hard to understand how most of the global high net worth audits had no changes, and expressed some concerns that this could happen again, but is hopeful that with the agency’s supplemental funding from the Inflation Reduction Act will come proper training to handle the complexities of reviewing these tax returns.

"I support the IRS being fully funded," she said. "It’s good for tax administration and it makes a fairer society because it’s not like people are just getting away with stuff because the IRS doesn’t have the resources."

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The IRS has cautioned taxpayers to be vigilant about promotions involving exaggerated art donation deductions that may target high-income individuals and has also provided valuable tips to help people steer clear of falling into such schemes. Taxpayers can legitimately claim art donations, but dishonest promoters may employ direct solicitation to make unrealistically promising offers. In a bid to boost compliance and protect taxpayers from scams, the IRS has active promoter investigations and taxpayer audits underway in this area.

The IRS has cautioned taxpayers to be vigilant about promotions involving exaggerated art donation deductions that may target high-income individuals and has also provided valuable tips to help people steer clear of falling into such schemes. Taxpayers can legitimately claim art donations, but dishonest promoters may employ direct solicitation to make unrealistically promising offers. In a bid to boost compliance and protect taxpayers from scams, the IRS has active promoter investigations and taxpayer audits underway in this area.

Also, the IRS has employed various compliance tools, including tax return audits and civil penalty investigations, to combat abusive art donations. Taxpayers, especially high-income individuals, are advised to watch out for aggressive promotions. Additionally, following Inflation Reduction Act funding the IRS has intensified the efforts to ensure accurate tax payments from high-income and high-wealth individuals.

The Service has advised taxpayers to watch-out for the following red flags:

• Be wary of purchasing multiple works by the same artist with little market value beyond what promoters claim.
• Watch for specific appraisers arranged by promoters, as their appraisals often lack crucial details.
• Taxpayers are responsible for accurate tax reporting, and engaging in tax avoidance schemes can lead to penalties, interest, fines, and even imprisonment.
• Charities should also be cautious not to inadvertently support these schemes.

In order to to properly claim a charitable contribution deduction for an art donation, a taxpayer must keep records to prove:

• Name and address of the charitable organization that received the art.
• Date and location of the contribution.
• Detailed description of the donated art.

Also, The IRS has a team of trained appraisers in Art Appraisal Services who provide assistance and advice to the IRS and taxpayers on valuation questions in connection with personal property and works of art.

Finally, the taxpayers can report tax-related illegal activities relating to charitable contributions of art using:

• Form 14242, Report Suspected Abusive Tax Promotions or Preparers, to report a suspected abusive tax avoidance scheme and tax return preparers who promote such schemes.
• They should also report fraud to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration at 800-366-4484.

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), enacted at the end of 2017, created the new Section 199A QBI deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, under current law the QBI deduction will sunset after 2025. In addition to the QBI deduction’s impermanence, its complexity and ambiguous statutory language have created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

The IRS first released much-anticipated proposed regulations for the new QBI deduction, REG-107892-18, on August 8, 2018. The proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2018. The IRS released the final regulations and notice of additional proposed rulemaking on January 18, 2019, followed by a revised version of the final regulations on February 1, 2019. Additionally, Rev. Proc. 2019-11 was issued concurrently to provide further guidance on the definition of wages. Also, a proposed revenue procedure, Notice 2019-7, was issued concurrently to provide a safe harbor under which certain rental real estate enterprises may be treated as a trade or business for purposes of Section 199A.

Wolters Kluwer recently interviewed Tom West, a principal in the passthroughs group of the Washington National Tax practice of KPMG LLP, about the Section 199A QBI deduction regulations. Notably, West formerly served as tax legislative counsel at the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy. This article represents the views of the author only and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Wolters Kluwer: What is your general overview of the revised, final regulations for the Section 199A Qualified Business Income (QBI) or "pass-through" deduction?

Tom West: I think it is admirable that Treasury and IRS were able to publish these final regulations so quickly and address so many of the comments and questions that the proposed regulations generated. I think they realized how important this particular package was to so many taxpayers for the 2018 filing season and, while questions obviously remain, having these rules out in time to inform decisions for this year’s tax returns is helpful. In particular, the liberalized aggregation rules and the additional examples regarding certain specified service trades or businesses (SSTBs) are the most consequential in my mind.

Wolters Kluwer: What should taxpayers and practitioners keep in mind in consideration of relying on either the proposed or final regulations for the 2018 tax year?

Tom West: I have to imagine that when choosing between the two, for most taxpayers the final regulations will ultimately provide the better result. The ability to aggregate at the entity level, which was only provided in the final regulations, may be a key consideration for those taxpayers with more complicated or tiered structures. That said, I do think taxpayers need to be careful in their aggregation modeling because you are going to be stuck with your aggregation once you’ve filed. It may be that some taxpayers wait on getting locked into a particular aggregation and continue to study the new rules—and even wait on additional guidance that may be coming. However, it may be important to note that the final regulations provide that if an individual fails to aggregate, the individual may not aggregate trades or businesses on an amended return—other than for the 2018 tax year.

Wolters Kluwer: How is the removal of the proposed 80 percent rule regarding specified service trades or businesses (SSTBs) from the final regulations likely to impact certain taxpayers?

Tom West: First of all, I think the removal of this rule is a demonstration of two important dynamics. One, the critical importance of the engagement of taxpayers in the comment process, and, two, the government’s willingness to listen and adapt in their rule-making. I don’t know if there are particular industries or taxpayers who will be impacted, but I do know that the change is a very logical and appropriate one, and logic doesn’t always prevail in these processes, so I’m happy to give the regulators credit when it does.

Wolters Kluwer: Which industries may have been helped or hindered by the final regulations with respect to SSTB rules?

Tom West: I’m not sure specific industries were helped, but the biggest positive in terms of the SSTB final rules is the carryover from the proposed regulations of the treatment of the skill or reputation provision. Had Treasury and the IRS gone in a different direction, there was a risk of that provision swallowing the rest of the 199A regime—not to mention how much more subjective the already sometimes difficult SSTB determinations would have become.

Wolters Kluwer: Are there any lingering, unanswered questions among taxpayers or practitioners that particularly stand out when determining what constitutes SSTB income?

Tom West: I think many taxpayers who have both SSTB and non-SSTB activities were hoping for more clarity, either in rules or examples, on how to acceptably segregate business lines or on when (or if) certain activities are inextricably tied together. There are also still lingering questions regarding when a trade or business is an SSTB—particularly in the field of health.

Wolters Kluwer: Were there any surprises in the final regulations?

Tom West: I don’t know if I’m surprised, knowing the concerns that led them to the decisions they made, but the fact that Treasury and IRS held the line on some of the SSTB-related rules is notable. I’m thinking specifically of the so-called "cliff" effect of the de minimis rule and the fact that owners of certain kinds of SSTB businesses, e.g., sports teams, are not allowed to benefit from the Section 199A deduction.

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), enacted at the end of 2017, created the new Section 199A QBI deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, under current law the QBI deduction will sunset after 2025. In addition to the QBI deduction’s impermanence, its complexity and ambiguous statutory language have created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

The IRS first released much-anticipated proposed regulations for the new QBI deduction, REG-107892-18, on August 8, 2018. The proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2018. The IRS released the final regulations and notice of additional proposed rulemaking on January 18, 2019, followed by a revised version of the final regulations on February 1, 2019. Additionally, Rev. Proc. 2019-11, I.R.B. 2019-9, 742, was issued concurrently to provide further guidance on the definition of wages. Also, a proposed Revenue Procedure, Notice 2019-7, I.R.B. 2019-9, 740, was issued, concurrently providing a safe harbor under which certain rental real estate enterprises may be treated as a trade or business for purposes of Section 199A.

Wolters Kluwer recently interviewed Tom West, a principal in the passthroughs group of the Washington National Tax practice of KPMG LLP, about the Section 199A QBI deduction regulations. Notably, West formerly served as tax legislative counsel at the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy. This article represents the views of the author only and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Wolters Kluwer: Neither the proposed nor final regulations for Section 199A give guidance as to when rental real estate activity constitutes a Section 162 trade or business. How might the application of the safe harbor provided for in IRS Notice 2019-7 offer taxpayers clarity? And how might failure to qualify for the safe harbor impact the determination of whether the rental activity is a trade or business under Section 199A?

Tom West: The safe harbor is helpful but it appears to be intended for relatively smaller taxpayers who may have had questions about their activities rising to the level of a trade or business. I don’t think falling outside of the safe harbor is dispositive—especially in light of the recent policy statement from Treasury regarding sub-regulatory guidance.

Wolters Kluwer: Can you speak to the some of the complexity that may be involved in tax planning with respect to achieving the right balance between adequate W-2 wages and QBI?

Tom West: Other than for small taxpayers, there is only a benefit under Section 199A if the limitations are met. It does not do any good to have QBI but then have insufficient W-2 wages and qualified property to meet the limitations. So when taxpayers are evaluating what constitutes a qualified trade or business (or whether to aggregate qualified trades or businesses) they will need to determine the amount of W-2 wages with respect to each QTB. Aligning the W-2 wages with the QTB will be important—but the salary expense will also result in a reduction in the amount of QBI and therefore the amount of any Section 199A benefit—so modeling becomes critical. Consideration should also be given to any collateral consequences—for instance the impact of the alignment on allocation and apportionment for state taxes.

Wolters Kluwer: According to a March 18, 2019, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) report, Reference Number: 2019-44-022, IRS management indicated that the timeline related to the issuance of Section 199A guidance did not provide enough time for the IRS to develop a QBI deduction tax form. Although the IRS did create a worksheet, do you have a prediction on what key elements may be included on the new form once released?

Tom West: I do think that worksheets could be developed that would facilitate the reporting of Section 199A information—particularly through tiered structures—so as to ease the reporting burden and enhance compliance.

Wolters Kluwer: The IRS has estimated that nearly 23.7 million taxpayers may be eligible to claim the Section 199A deduction and that more than 22.2 million (94 percent) of those eligible taxpayers will not require a complex calculation for the deduction. What notable differences do you expect there are between "complex" and the majority of calculations?

Tom West: For taxpayers under the Section 199A income thresholds ($157.5K single, $315K joint), the deduction is very easy to calculate and claim. Those taxpayers don’t need to worry about being in an SSTB, how much wages they paid, or the basis of their property. Once those taxpayers hit those income thresholds though, even in the phase-out range, things very quickly get complex—and that’s as a consequence of the statute; it is not something that the regulators can change.

Wolters Kluwer: Do you anticipate the IRS will issue further guidance on the Section 199A deduction?

Tom West: I do. As I said at the top, I think part of the government’s motivation in finalizing these regulations so quickly was providing guidance to taxpayers ahead of the tax-filing season. And while for the majority of taxpayers who are below the 199A cap there is probably now sufficient guidance, I think there are still a lot of questions for those with more complex situations. Given the number of taxpayers who are eligible for this deduction, and the importance of Section 199A as the big benefit to non-corporate businesses in what the Administration views as a signature legislative achievement, I have to believe that the government will be responsive to taxpayers’ requests for additional help on this provision. However, given that the provision is due to sunset, it will be important that any guidance is forthcoming in fairly short order to be of any usefulness to taxpayers.

Wolters Kluwer: At this time, do you have any recommendations for taxpayers and practitioners moving forward?

Tom West: As people are going through their tax filings this year, I’d keep a list of issues, questions, and areas where additional guidance would be helpful. It often happens that problems with new legislation or regulations don’t reveal themselves until taxpayers have to put pencil to paper and track their real-world numbers through returns. We’ll all have that experience this year and, with those lists of issues and questions in hand, there may be an opportunity to approach the IRS and Treasury in the hopes of getting resolution going forward. Keeping that list could also help identify areas for tax planning and perhaps ease the complexity of filing for 2019.

The IRS released the optional standard mileage rates for 2019. Most taxpayers may use these rates to compute deductible costs of operating vehicles for:

The IRS released the optional standard mileage rates for 2019. Most taxpayers may use these rates to compute deductible costs of operating vehicles for:

• business,
• medical, and
• charitable purposes.

Some members of the military may also use these rates to compute their moving expense deductions.

2019 Standard Mileage Rates
The standard mileage rates for 2019 are:

• 58 cents per mile for business uses;
• 20 cents per mile for medical uses; and
• 14 cents per mile for charitable uses.

Taxpayers may use these rates, instead of their actual expenses, to calculate their deductions for business, medical or charitable use of their own vehicles.

FAVR Allowance for 2019
For purposes of the fixed and variable rate (FAVR) allowance, the maximum standard automobile cost for vehicles places in service after 2018 is:

• $50,400 for passenger automobiles, and
• $50,400 for trucks and vans.

Employers can use a FAVR allowance to reimburse employees who use their own vehicles for the employer’s business.

2019 Mileage Rate for Moving Expenses
The standard mileage rate for the moving expense deduction is 20 cents per mile. To claim this deduction, the taxpayer must be:

• a member of the Armed Forces of the United States,
• on active military duty, and
• moving under an military order and incident to a permanent change of station.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 suspended the moving expense deduction for all other taxpayers until 2026.

Unreimbursed Employee Travel Expenses
For most taxpayers, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act suspended the miscellaneous itemized deduction for unreimbursed employee travel expenses. However, certain taxpayers may still claim an above-the-line deduction for these expenses. These taxpayers include:

• members of a reserve component of the U.S. Armed Forces,
• state or local government officials paid on a fee basis, and
• performing artists with relatively low incomes.

Notice 2018-3, I.R.B. 2018-2, 285, as modified by Notice 2018-42, I.R.B. 2018-24, 750, is superseded.

The IRS has provided interim guidance for the 2019 calendar year on income tax withholding from wages and withholding from retirement and annuity distributions. In general, certain 2018 withholding rules provided in Notice 2018-14, I.R.B. 2018-7, 353, will remain in effect for the 2019 calendar year, with one exception.

The IRS has provided interim guidance for the 2019 calendar year on income tax withholding from wages and withholding from retirement and annuity distributions. In general, certain 2018 withholding rules provided in Notice 2018-14, I.R.B. 2018-7, 353, will remain in effect for the 2019 calendar year, with one exception.

The IRS and the Treasury Department intend to develop income tax withholding regulations to reflect changes made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), as well as other changes in the Code since the regulations were last amended, and certain miscellaneous changes consistent with current procedures.

Withholding Allowances
The IRS delayed the release of the 2018 Form W-4, Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate, in order to reflect changes made by the TCJA, such as changes in itemized deductions available, increases in the child tax credit, the new credit for other dependents, and the suspension of personal exemption deductions. Notice 2018-14 provided relief for employers and employees affected by the delay.

In June, the IRS released a draft 2019 Form W-4 and instructions, which incorporated changes that were meant to improve the accuracy of income tax withholding and make the withholding system more transparent. However, in response to stakeholders’ comments, the IRS later announced that the redesigned Form W-4 would be postponed until 2020. The IRS intends to release a 2019 Form W-4 before the end of 2018 that makes minimal changes to the 2018 Form W-4.

The 2019 Form W-4 and the computational procedures in IRS Publication 15 (Circular E), Employer’s Tax Guide, will continue to use the term "withholding allowances" and related terminology to incorporate the withholding allowance factors specified in Code Sec. 3402(f) and the additional allowance items in Code Sec. 3402(m). Until further guidance is issued, references to a "withholding exemption" in the Code Sec. 3402 regulations and guidance will be applied as if they were referring to a withholding allowance.

Changes in Status
The guidance provides that if an employee experiences a change of status on or before April 30, 2019, that reduces the number of withholding allowances to which he or she is entitled, and if that change is solely due to the changes made by the TCJA, the employee generally must furnish a new Form W-4 to the employer by May 10, 2019. However, if an employee no longer reasonably expects to be entitled to a claimed number of allowances due to a change in personal circumstances that is not solely related to TCJA changes, the employee must furnish his or her employer a new Form W-4 within 10 days after the change. Similarly, if an employee claims married filing status on Form W-4 but divorces his or her spouse, the employee must furnish the employer a new Form W-4 within 10 days after the change.

Failure to Furnish
The IRS and the Treasury Department intend to withdraw the regulations under Code Sec. 3401(e), and modify other regulations, so that an employee who fails to furnish a Form W-4 will be treated as "single" but entitled to the number of withholding allowances determined under computational procedures provided in IRS Publication 15. Until further guidance is issued, however, employees who fail to furnish a Form W-4 will be treated as single with zero withholding allowances.

Additional Allowances
Until further guidance is issued, a taxpayer may include his or her estimated Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction in determining whether he or she can claim the additional withholding allowance under Code Sec. 3402(m) on Form W-4.

Alternative Procedure
The IRS and the Treasury Department intend to update the withholding regulations to explicitly allow employees to determine their Form W-4 entries by using the IRS withholding calculator ( www.irs.gov/W4App) or IRS Publication 505, Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax, instead of having to complete certain schedules included with the Form W-4. However, the regulations are expected to provide that an employee cannot use the withholding calculator if the calculator’s instructions state that it should not be used due to his or her individual tax situation. The employee will need to use Publication 505 instead.

Alternative Methods
The IRS and the Treasury Department intend to eliminate the combined income tax withholding and employee FICA tax withholding tables under Reg. §31.3402(h)(4)-1(b), due to this alternative procedure’s unintended complexity and burden.

Lock-In Letters
The IRS may issue a "lock-in letter" to an employer, which sets the maximum number of withholding allowances an employee may claim. If the employer no longer employs the employee, the employer must send a written response to the IRS office designated in the lock-in letter that the employee is not employed by the employer. The IRS and the Treasury Department intend to eliminate the written response requirement. Pending further guidance, employers should not send a written response to the IRS under Reg. §31.3402(f)(2)-1(g)(2)(iv).

Pension, Annuity Payments
The payor of certain periodic payments for pensions, annuities, and other deferred income generally must withhold tax from the payments as if they were wages, unless the individual payee elects not to have withholding apply. Before 2018, if a withholding certificate was not furnished to the payor, the withholding rate was determined by treating the payee as a married individual claiming three withholding exemptions. The TCJA amended this rule so that the rate "shall be determined under rules prescribed by the Secretary." The IRS has determined that, for 2019, withholding on periodic payments when no withholding certificate is in effect continues to be based on treating the payee as a married individual claiming three withholding allowances.

Comments Requested
The IRS and the Treasury Department request comments on both the interim guidance and the guidance that should be provided in regulations. Comments must be received by January 25, 2019. Comments should be submitted to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2018-92), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C., 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2018-92), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20224. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit comments electronically to Notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov (include "Notice 2018-92" in the subject line of any electronic submission).

Tax-Related Portion of the Substance Use–Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT) for Patients and Communities Act, Enrolled, as Signed by the President on October 24, 2018, P.L. 115-271

Tax-Related Portion of the Substance Use–Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT) for Patients and Communities Act, Enrolled, as Signed by the President on October 24, 2018, P.L. 115-271

President Donald Trump has signed bipartisan legislation, which expands a religious exemption for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) ( P.L. 111-148) individual mandate. The exemption is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018.

Religious Exemption

SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act ( HR 6) amends Code Sec. 5000A(d)(2)(a) to expand the religious conscience exemption for the ACA individual mandate. Individual taxpayers who rely solely on a religious method of healing for whom the acceptance of medical health services would be inconsistent with their religious beliefs are exempt from the ACA mandate to maintain health insurance or pay a penalty.

Tax Reform

Additionally, last year’s tax reform legislation essentially repeals the ACA’s individual mandate. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) repeals the ACA’s shared responsibility payment for individuals failing to maintain minimum essential coverage effective January 1, 2019.